It’s very clear to me I could have written this if I had wanted to—and at the very least I’m sure Paul could have as well. As evidence: it took me ~1 hour to list off all the existing sources that cover every one of these points in my comment.
Well, there’s obviously a lot of points missing! And from the amount this post was upvoted, it’s clear that people saw the half-assed current form as valuable.
Why don’t you start listing out all the missing further points, then? (Bonus points for any that don’t trace back to my own invention, though I realize a lot of people may not realize how much of this stuff traces back to my own invention.)
I think he means that there are more points that could be made. (If the points in the post are the training set, can you also produce the points in the held-out test set?)
It’s very clear to me I could have written this if I had wanted to—and at the very least I’m sure Paul could have as well. As evidence: it took me ~1 hour to list off all the existing sources that cover every one of these points in my comment.
Well, there’s obviously a lot of points missing! And from the amount this post was upvoted, it’s clear that people saw the half-assed current form as valuable.
Why don’t you start listing out all the missing further points, then? (Bonus points for any that don’t trace back to my own invention, though I realize a lot of people may not realize how much of this stuff traces back to my own invention.)
I’m not sure what you mean by missing points? I only included your technical claims, not your sociological ones, if that’s what you mean.
I think he means that there are more points that could be made. (If the points in the post are the training set, can you also produce the points in the held-out test set?)