Etna’s most destructive eruption since 122 BC started on 11 March 1669 and produced lava flows that destroyed at least 10 villages on its southern flank before reaching the city walls of the town of Catania five weeks later, on 15 April. The lava was largely diverted by these walls into the sea to the south of the city, filling the harbour of Catania. A small portion of lava eventually broke through a fragile section of the city walls on the western side of Catania and destroyed a few buildings before stopping in the rear of the Benedictine monastery, without reaching the centre of the town.
That’s probably also what’s referenced later on:
There is much literary wisdom in those stories. It is born of harsh experience and cities of ash.
(though it’s pretty likely that in HPMOR-verse, all volcano eruptions, earthquakes, tsunamis, etc. are caused by Magic Gone Wrong)
(though it’s pretty likely that in HPMOR-verse, all volcano eruptions, earthquakes, tsunamis, etc. are caused by Magic Gone Wrong)
I doubt it, since first off, many of them long predate humans, and second, something would have to be seriously wrong with our model of geology for plate tectonics to not sometimes result in volcanoes or earthquakes.
Sheerly for the sake of playing devil’s advocate (do we have an alternate term here?):
The “fact” that volcanoes and earthquakes occur because of magic doesn’t mean that our model is wrong. The tension that is building up for these natural disasters would still be there—the magic would just trigger it earlier that it would have otherwise.
There’s a good chance that EY didn’t want to allude to any historical event. Maybe his writer’s instincts to give concrete examples kicked into gear, and he made up a fictional event about a fictional society.
But suppose he did choose to allude to a specific historical event. Why would he choose this one?
He would not choose this event because it was a great disaster with many casualties. According to the Wikipedia article, there is no historical record of any deaths from this eruption, and the disaster is overshadowed historically by the 1693 Sicilian Earthquake. If EY were going for famous and lethal disasters, he would be very unlikely to choose this one when there are so many more famous ones.
He would not choose this disaster because it is Italian. Italy was not well defined in the 17th century. If you had to choose some place to represent modern day Italy, you would be far more likely to choose a place in Northern Italy (like Florence, where modern Italian comes from) than a city in southern Italy (like Sicily, which was ruled by the Spanish in the 17th century).
The only circumstance under which I think EY would choose specifically to allude to Etna’s eruption is if he needed to refer to a volcano. If EY needed to refer to a volcanic eruption, it’s probably about Horcruxes.
“Plan B,” said Harry. “Encase the Dementor in dense metal with a high melting point, probably tungsten, drop it into an active volcano, and hope it ends up inside Earth’s mantle. Ah, the whole planet is filled with molten lava under its surface—”
“Yes,” said Professor Quirrell. “I know.” The Defense Professor was wearing a very odd smile. “I really should have thought of that myself, all things considered. Tell me, Mr. Potter, if you wanted to lose something where no one would ever find it again, where would you put it?”
Quirrell could be smiling because someone else put a Horcrux in Etna, but given his history with Pioneer I think it is more likely that Quirrell himself did the deed.
So (finally), after this long inference chance, I have slightly raise my belief that Quirrell is hundreds of years old.
But would Quirrell refer to someone placing a horcrux in Etna as “folly”, given that it is apparently one of the best things you can do with a horcrux? And would he choose to allude to something like this in front of Harry when, unlike with the Pioneer Plaque, he doesn’t stand to benefit from revealing the information?
If Quirrell alluded to Etna’s eruption in Chapter 95, then Quirrell likely was thinking about Etna’s eruption when wearing a very odd smile in Chapter 46. I’m advancing only the implication, not the antecedent.
2) “Playing a game of lying with truths”. Don’t forget “Voldemort has long since killed my family … I have dealt with my familial issues to my satisfaction.”
For those wondering about this:
323 years before 1992, this happened:
That’s probably also what’s referenced later on:
(though it’s pretty likely that in HPMOR-verse, all volcano eruptions, earthquakes, tsunamis, etc. are caused by Magic Gone Wrong)
I doubt it, since first off, many of them long predate humans, and second, something would have to be seriously wrong with our model of geology for plate tectonics to not sometimes result in volcanoes or earthquakes.
Sheerly for the sake of playing devil’s advocate (do we have an alternate term here?):
The “fact” that volcanoes and earthquakes occur because of magic doesn’t mean that our model is wrong. The tension that is building up for these natural disasters would still be there—the magic would just trigger it earlier that it would have otherwise.
There’s a good chance that EY didn’t want to allude to any historical event. Maybe his writer’s instincts to give concrete examples kicked into gear, and he made up a fictional event about a fictional society.
But suppose he did choose to allude to a specific historical event. Why would he choose this one?
He would not choose this event because it was a great disaster with many casualties. According to the Wikipedia article, there is no historical record of any deaths from this eruption, and the disaster is overshadowed historically by the 1693 Sicilian Earthquake. If EY were going for famous and lethal disasters, he would be very unlikely to choose this one when there are so many more famous ones.
He would not choose this disaster because it is Italian. Italy was not well defined in the 17th century. If you had to choose some place to represent modern day Italy, you would be far more likely to choose a place in Northern Italy (like Florence, where modern Italian comes from) than a city in southern Italy (like Sicily, which was ruled by the Spanish in the 17th century).
The only circumstance under which I think EY would choose specifically to allude to Etna’s eruption is if he needed to refer to a volcano. If EY needed to refer to a volcanic eruption, it’s probably about Horcruxes.
Quirrell could be smiling because someone else put a Horcrux in Etna, but given his history with Pioneer I think it is more likely that Quirrell himself did the deed.
So (finally), after this long inference chance, I have slightly raise my belief that Quirrell is hundreds of years old.
But would Quirrell refer to someone placing a horcrux in Etna as “folly”, given that it is apparently one of the best things you can do with a horcrux? And would he choose to allude to something like this in front of Harry when, unlike with the Pioneer Plaque, he doesn’t stand to benefit from revealing the information?
If Quirrell alluded to Etna’s eruption in Chapter 95, then Quirrell likely was thinking about Etna’s eruption when wearing a very odd smile in Chapter 46. I’m advancing only the implication, not the antecedent.
1) Because it exploded.
2) “Playing a game of lying with truths”. Don’t forget “Voldemort has long since killed my family … I have dealt with my familial issues to my satisfaction.”
Sorry, how did he stand to benefit from telling Harry about the plaque?
No, 323 years.
Sorry, it confused me for about ten seconds.
:D Whoops! Fixed, thanks.
For a moment I was afraid that I got my calculations wrong and the actual date referenced was 1769...