Basically its a challenge for people to briefly describe an FAI goal-set, and for others to respond by telling them how that will all go horribly wrong. … We should encourage a slightly more serious version of this.
I think I’d like the comments to be broadly organised and developed as the common themes and main arguments emerge. Apart from that a little more detail. I don’t think it has to go into much implementation specifics, because that’s a separate issue and requires a more highly developed set of math/CS skills. But I think we can make use of a broader set of smart brains by having this kind of discussion.
Thanks for the link. I reposted the idea currently on my mind hoping to get some criticism.
But more importantly, what features would you be looking for in a more serious version of that game?
I think I’d like the comments to be broadly organised and developed as the common themes and main arguments emerge. Apart from that a little more detail. I don’t think it has to go into much implementation specifics, because that’s a separate issue and requires a more highly developed set of math/CS skills. But I think we can make use of a broader set of smart brains by having this kind of discussion.