If you read his reply, he wanted me to explain what the truth-makers of moral propositions are.
I think he wanted you to taboo it, dear.
I noticed, sweetie. But it’s belief in belief. If you have disproved something, you can repeat or cite the disproof. I have argued this topic out with at least half a dozen LWers, and none of them could put up a coherent case. Kawoomba gave up out, after apparently downvoting a bunch of my postings as a parting shot. That’s the quality of argument.
I think he wanted you to taboo it, dear.
We mostly think it’s disproved, to local standards of disproof.
If you read his reply, he wanted me to explain what the truth-makers of moral propositions are.
I noticed, sweetie. But it’s belief in belief. If you have disproved something, you can repeat or cite the disproof. I have argued this topic out with at least half a dozen LWers, and none of them could put up a coherent case. Kawoomba gave up out, after apparently downvoting a bunch of my postings as a parting shot. That’s the quality of argument.