But didn’t you say that if you find that your FAI design needs to be patched up to resolve some issue, you should rather abandon it and look for another? This redundancy of security looks like a patchup to me. As long as neither the AIs intent nor the boxing is proven to be secure, we are not ready to start development; once one is, we do not need the other.
But didn’t you say that if you find that your FAI design needs to be patched up to resolve some issue, you should rather abandon it and look for another? This redundancy of security looks like a patchup to me. As long as neither the AIs intent nor the boxing is proven to be secure, we are not ready to start development; once one is, we do not need the other.
Redundancy isn’t a design failure or a ‘patch’.