Thanks for this. Is there some reasoning about why “extreme” is minimized with this randomness (presumably some reason to expect that effectiveness is correlated with extremety)? And why randomize, rather than just picking the 95%tile option always?
Thanks for this. Is there some reasoning about why “extreme” is minimized with this randomness (presumably some reason to expect that effectiveness is correlated with extremety)? And why randomize, rather than just picking the 95%tile option always?