I voted it up because I feel that especially for beginners negative feedback should basically be no worse than −1, and also because I’m an Eva fan.
From the title, I had expected to read about cognitive prostheses, the extended mind hypothesis, wireheading, Dewey’s “Learning What to Value” AIXI variant, etc.
And what did I get… That said, why is this a bad article? Because it seems to consist entirely of half-baked rhetorical questions, odd examples and language, and no hard grounding of any kind or even a clear thesis. Basically, it reads like the stereotypical freshman college student bull session.
I voted it up because I feel that especially for beginners negative feedback should basically be no worse than −1, and also because I’m an Eva fan.
From the title, I had expected to read about cognitive prostheses, the extended mind hypothesis, wireheading, Dewey’s “Learning What to Value” AIXI variant, etc.
And what did I get… That said, why is this a bad article? Because it seems to consist entirely of half-baked rhetorical questions, odd examples and language, and no hard grounding of any kind or even a clear thesis. Basically, it reads like the stereotypical freshman college student bull session.