I expected this post to do similarly to how other comparable posts do on LW (first-time post, political topic, not a lot of hard analysis and abstraction, not a lot of sources linked to).
What? You expected to be downvoted and you had the audacity to post anyway?
From my perspective, it was the length of text, the dislaimer at the beginning, the fact that (at least how it seemed to me) you didn’t obviously attack anyone, and the few interesting ideas in the article. Plus you had the luck that someone else didn’t write a horrible comment “inspired by” your article, which could have also reflected badly on you.
What? You expected to be downvoted and you had the audacity to post anyway?
From my perspective, it was the length of text, the dislaimer at the beginning, the fact that (at least how it seemed to me) you didn’t obviously attack anyone, and the few interesting ideas in the article. Plus you had the luck that someone else didn’t write a horrible comment “inspired by” your article, which could have also reflected badly on you.
No idea how to do that on Twitter (the amount of data there is insane), it just reminded me of a “cancel watch” for higher education.