Reading a little bit, I’m reminded that there’s more than one party involved here.
Now, I’m no scientist, but you don’t have a diet without a person. We can correctly assume that you can’t go on without one or the other. Coming from this way, we can make an rather simple observation that not every diet is the same, and that not every person is the same. While the diet part is extremely important, it’s not as important as the person, as ultimately the diet is digested inside the person. Considering every person is different, would it be a far stretch to say that their diet should be different, too?
This is a simple observation I made just now. I’ve noticed an dispropronate weight on people’s diet. It’s not entirely incorrect—there is some common ground between people. But people are micro/macro-different, healthy is still a vague term (some sort of close-to synonym with nutriential value) and even my observation might not include all of the parties involved. But I think it’s a good general look in the right direction.
So, if we were to think about nutrition, we should first clear the things with the largest weight so we have a good base to stand on. And we incrementally build the pyramid from there.
Reading a little bit, I’m reminded that there’s more than one party involved here.
Now, I’m no scientist, but you don’t have a diet without a person. We can correctly assume that you can’t go on without one or the other. Coming from this way, we can make an rather simple observation that not every diet is the same, and that not every person is the same. While the diet part is extremely important, it’s not as important as the person, as ultimately the diet is digested inside the person. Considering every person is different, would it be a far stretch to say that their diet should be different, too?
This is a simple observation I made just now. I’ve noticed an dispropronate weight on people’s diet. It’s not entirely incorrect—there is some common ground between people. But people are micro/macro-different, healthy is still a vague term (some sort of close-to synonym with nutriential value) and even my observation might not include all of the parties involved. But I think it’s a good general look in the right direction.
So, if we were to think about nutrition, we should first clear the things with the largest weight so we have a good base to stand on. And we incrementally build the pyramid from there.