I am not sure I follow, I am confused about whether the 60⁄80 family refers to both parents, and what is meant by “off-beat” and “snap-back”, I am also confused about what the numbers mean is it 60⁄80 of the genes or 60⁄80 of the coding region (so only 40 genes)
60 trait supporting genes out of 80 locations that could support it. I am worried that the main finding is misleading because it is an improper application of spherical cow thinking to a concept that oriented to dealing with messiness.
fair point. I think my target audience is people like me who heard this saying about colorblindness (or other classical Mendelian diseases that runs in families)
I am not sure I follow, I am confused about whether the 60⁄80 family refers to both parents, and what is meant by “off-beat” and “snap-back”, I am also confused about what the numbers mean is it 60⁄80 of the genes or 60⁄80 of the coding region (so only 40 genes)
60 trait supporting genes out of 80 locations that could support it. I am worried that the main finding is misleading because it is an improper application of spherical cow thinking to a concept that oriented to dealing with messiness.
fair point. I think my target audience is people like me who heard this saying about colorblindness (or other classical Mendelian diseases that runs in families)
I have added a disclaimer towards the end :)