“There is no view from nowhere.” Your mind was created already in motion and thinks, whether you want it to or not, and whatever ontological assumptions it may start with, it has pragmatically already started with them years before you ever worried about such questions. Your Neurathian raft has already been replaced many times over on the basis of decisions and outcomes.
I’m not sure I follow what you’re saying. What are you suggesting is the specific problem that remains after the question of “should we believe this thing” is addressed via the “beliefs are for actions” approach?
It does help ground things but isn’t a full accounting on the philosophy of science side since your decision model has ontological commitments.
“There is no view from nowhere.” Your mind was created already in motion and thinks, whether you want it to or not, and whatever ontological assumptions it may start with, it has pragmatically already started with them years before you ever worried about such questions. Your Neurathian raft has already been replaced many times over on the basis of decisions and outcomes.
I’m not sure I follow what you’re saying. What are you suggesting is the specific problem that remains after the question of “should we believe this thing” is addressed via the “beliefs are for actions” approach?