Kind of moot now but she gave it a good ‘5’ out of 9 (= a strong pass grade for UK students aged 14-16 years old).
Grammar and argument structure is excellent—the essay flows well with a coherent introduction and conclusion based on the text’s body. The student seems to understand the topic well (though obv I have no idea about it) and addresses a few different aspects of the industry.
The essay misses the opportunity for deeper back-and-forth critical analysis, although there is evidence of this being attempted. And it could go deeper into the environmental effects or more specific historical context, like key figures or companies in the industry.
I’d probably give this a 5 - maybe a 6!
So not quite a ‘high mark’. This doesn’t necessarily mean GPT3.5 definitely doesn’t meet the criteria—just one example of it not.
Thanks Zoe!
I think GPT-4 meets the criteria but I haven’t looked in-depth or updated this post to include GPT-4′s capabilities (although I think it would be reasonable to do so because GPT-4′s capabilities seem fully developed by Feb 2023) - because it goes against my criteria (and because I don’t plan to spend the time to do it). I’ll probably update it in a year though!
Kind of moot now but she gave it a good ‘5’ out of 9 (= a strong pass grade for UK students aged 14-16 years old).
So not quite a ‘high mark’. This doesn’t necessarily mean GPT3.5 definitely doesn’t meet the criteria—just one example of it not.
Thanks Zoe!
I think GPT-4 meets the criteria but I haven’t looked in-depth or updated this post to include GPT-4′s capabilities (although I think it would be reasonable to do so because GPT-4′s capabilities seem fully developed by Feb 2023) - because it goes against my criteria (and because I don’t plan to spend the time to do it). I’ll probably update it in a year though!