When a dom/sub relationship is non-abusive, it’s the sub who has the real power, which seems to contradict your “patriarchal” assertion.
When a employer and employee relationships is non-abusive, it is the employee that has the real power.
Does this sentence make sense to you? I mean it may seem plausible but when asserted if it isn’t standard economics theory we will probably want to hear an argument and some related evidence. Where is the difference between the epistemic status of this statement and yours?
I’m pretty sure the quoted sentence is popular meme in the wider BDSM community because it is compatible with the status games wider Western society plays with regards to sexual ethics and practice not because it is true (it may be). People in other words approve when something like that is said regardless if it is true or not. Not that I have much experience with their community or subculture beyond reading a few blogs.
I’m pretty sure the quoted sentence is popular meme in the wider BDSM community because it is compatible with the status games wider Western society plays with regards to sexual ethics and practice not because it is true (it may be).
The meme as both principle and practice was developed as a way of defending BDSM from the vanilla public. Employer-employee relationships are a standard part of society and need no such defence.
One might suppose that tautologically, the sentence is true of those relationships which are so conducted, and not in those that are not. But this oversimplifies things. Without the meme in the air, who would think to ask the question, “where does the real power lie?”, let alone answer it with “the sub”? But with the idea available, it becomes an option, whether taken or not, for conceptualising and structuring relationships.
When a employer and employee relationships is non-abusive, it is the employee that has the real power.
Does this sentence make sense to you? I mean it may seem plausible but when asserted if it isn’t standard economics theory we will probably want to hear an argument and some related evidence. Where is the difference between the epistemic status of this statement and yours?
I’m pretty sure the quoted sentence is popular meme in the wider BDSM community because it is compatible with the status games wider Western society plays with regards to sexual ethics and practice not because it is true (it may be). People in other words approve when something like that is said regardless if it is true or not. Not that I have much experience with their community or subculture beyond reading a few blogs.
The meme as both principle and practice was developed as a way of defending BDSM from the vanilla public. Employer-employee relationships are a standard part of society and need no such defence.
One might suppose that tautologically, the sentence is true of those relationships which are so conducted, and not in those that are not. But this oversimplifies things. Without the meme in the air, who would think to ask the question, “where does the real power lie?”, let alone answer it with “the sub”? But with the idea available, it becomes an option, whether taken or not, for conceptualising and structuring relationships.