I have previously noticed (having watched a good hundred hours of Peterson’s lectures) all of these things and these seem to me to be either straight-up misinterpretation on the part of the listener (taboo your words!) or the tiny number of inevitable false positives that comes out of Peterson operating his own nonstandard cognitive strategy, which is basically UNSONG Kabbalah.
This overall argument reminds me of the kind of student who protests that “i isn’t actually a number” or “a step function doesn’t actually have a derivative.”
I have previously noticed (having watched a good hundred hours of Peterson’s lectures) all of these things and these seem to me to be either straight-up misinterpretation on the part of the listener (taboo your words!) or the tiny number of inevitable false positives that comes out of Peterson operating his own nonstandard cognitive strategy, which is basically UNSONG Kabbalah.
This overall argument reminds me of the kind of student who protests that “i isn’t actually a number” or “a step function doesn’t actually have a derivative.”