When it comes to epistemic rigour, you show in your post that you clearly have a strong personal motivation for believing that rejecting religion is a good sign to pass other epistemic hurdles but at the same you don’t provide any good evidence for the claim.
The priors for taken a particular single characteristic that’s tribal in nature like religious beliefs as a high information for whether or not a person is rational aren’t good.
When it comes to epistemic rigour, you show in your post that you clearly have a strong personal motivation for believing that rejecting religion is a good sign to pass other epistemic hurdles but at the same you don’t provide any good evidence for the claim.
The priors for taken a particular single characteristic that’s tribal in nature like religious beliefs as a high information for whether or not a person is rational aren’t good.
Crisis of Faith