Another possible implication might be incentives towards defining organizational mission in ways that effectively make the problematic truths “out of mission” so purely private views. Then the truth sayer will only be speaking as an individual—which could perhaps have them moved out of membership if it the actions were to disrupt the organizational mission. Or simply remove them from any protections some group membership might have otherwise provided.
Another possible implication might be incentives towards defining organizational mission in ways that effectively make the problematic truths “out of mission” so purely private views. Then the truth sayer will only be speaking as an individual—which could perhaps have them moved out of membership if it the actions were to disrupt the organizational mission. Or simply remove them from any protections some group membership might have otherwise provided.