If a heuristic claims 100% success rate in a specific context, one can show it proves too much by proving a counterexample
Inspired by your induction example, induction is very useful for proofs regarding Natural numbers, but it breaks down in the context of moral reasoning (or even just the context of Real numbers).
This is a better frame of Proving Too Much than I have framed it in this post. I will need to either edit the post or make a new one and link it at the top of this article. Either way thanks!
With that said, I don’t think this captures your point of uncertainty over both valid arguments and possible worlds. Would you elaborate on how your point relates to the above, updated model?
I really like this! I think my model is now:
Inspired by your induction example, induction is very useful for proofs regarding Natural numbers, but it breaks down in the context of moral reasoning (or even just the context of Real numbers).
This is a better frame of Proving Too Much than I have framed it in this post. I will need to either edit the post or make a new one and link it at the top of this article. Either way thanks!
With that said, I don’t think this captures your point of uncertainty over both valid arguments and possible worlds. Would you elaborate on how your point relates to the above, updated model?