I’d be a bad god. I’d probably encode some mix of kindness and responsibility, and likely a more static enjoyment of what is than a striving for change. I presume they’d never get out of hunter/gatherer mode.
And now I’m wondering exactly what my limits are. I don’t think “a theory of morality” is something that stands alone in people. I translated that in my mind to a set of personality traits and behaviors that would automatically be enforced somehow and not evolve over time (in individuals or across generations). But if you mean more constrained cognitive moral theories that most of ’em don’t actually follow very well, I’m not sure what I’d choose.
Note that none of this applies to real humans, nor perhaps any agents in this universe.
I’d be a bad god. I’d probably encode some mix of kindness and responsibility, and likely a more static enjoyment of what is than a striving for change. I presume they’d never get out of hunter/gatherer mode.
And now I’m wondering exactly what my limits are. I don’t think “a theory of morality” is something that stands alone in people. I translated that in my mind to a set of personality traits and behaviors that would automatically be enforced somehow and not evolve over time (in individuals or across generations). But if you mean more constrained cognitive moral theories that most of ’em don’t actually follow very well, I’m not sure what I’d choose.
Note that none of this applies to real humans, nor perhaps any agents in this universe.