I’m surprised that it’s one-dimensional as that should be relatively easy for the game. If the attacker cares about promoting Israeli interests or Chinese interests they can just cast a lot of votes in the other right/left direction on topics they don’t care about.
Did they write anywhere why they only consider one-dimension?
“Note: for now, to avoid overfitting on our very small dataset, we only use 1-dimensional factors. We expect to increase this dimensionality as our dataset size grows significantly.”
That sounds right intuitively. One thing worth noting though is that most notes get very few ratings, and most users rate very few notes, so it might be trickier than it sounds. Also if I were them I might worry about some drastic changes in note rankings as a result of switching models. Currently, just as notes can become helpful by reaching a threshold of 0.4, they can lose this status by dropping below 0.39. They may also have to manually pick new thresholds, as well as maybe redesign the algorithm slightly (since it seems that a lot of this algorithm was built via trial and error, rather than clear principles).
I’m surprised that it’s one-dimensional as that should be relatively easy for the game. If the attacker cares about promoting Israeli interests or Chinese interests they can just cast a lot of votes in the other right/left direction on topics they don’t care about.
Did they write anywhere why they only consider one-dimension?
“Note: for now, to avoid overfitting on our very small dataset, we only use 1-dimensional factors. We expect to increase this dimensionality as our dataset size grows significantly.”
This was the reason given from the documentation.
That sounds like it made sense at the beginning but now the data set should be large enough that a higher dimensional approach would be better?
That sounds right intuitively. One thing worth noting though is that most notes get very few ratings, and most users rate very few notes, so it might be trickier than it sounds. Also if I were them I might worry about some drastic changes in note rankings as a result of switching models. Currently, just as notes can become helpful by reaching a threshold of 0.4, they can lose this status by dropping below 0.39. They may also have to manually pick new thresholds, as well as maybe redesign the algorithm slightly (since it seems that a lot of this algorithm was built via trial and error, rather than clear principles).