I hadn’t seen that paper before and it’s very interesting.
Glad you liked it!
I chose “rationality realism” as a parallel to “moral realism”, which I don’t think carries the connotations you mentioned.
I guess you could infer that “just as moral realism implies that objective morality is real, rationality realism implies that objective rationality is real”, but that interpretation didn’t even occur to me before reading this comment. And also importantly, “rationality realism” wasn’t the term that you used in the post; you used “realism about rationality”. “Realism about morality” would also have a different connotation than “moral realism” does.
I realized a few paragraphs in that this was meant to be parallel to “moral realism,” and I agree that a title of “rationality realism” would have been clearer.
Glad you liked it!
I guess you could infer that “just as moral realism implies that objective morality is real, rationality realism implies that objective rationality is real”, but that interpretation didn’t even occur to me before reading this comment. And also importantly, “rationality realism” wasn’t the term that you used in the post; you used “realism about rationality”. “Realism about morality” would also have a different connotation than “moral realism” does.
I realized a few paragraphs in that this was meant to be parallel to “moral realism,” and I agree that a title of “rationality realism” would have been clearer.