Would you still object to the comment if both the instances of “bayesian” and the “cue one of us, one of us” were removed? (BTW, I upvoted your comment, since I didn’t get what exactly “cue one of us, one of us” referred to.)
I didn’t get what exactly “cue one of us, one of us” referred to
It’s a reference to this. So while it might be an ingrouping, it’s a somewhat ironic/self-deprecating one, positioning LW members as “freaks” offering Graham a perhaps-not-so-welcome acceptance. ;-)
Downvoted for encouraging an ingroup-outgroup separation based on a trivial distinction (namely, Bayesianism).
Would you still object to the comment if both the instances of “bayesian” and the “cue one of us, one of us” were removed? (BTW, I upvoted your comment, since I didn’t get what exactly “cue one of us, one of us” referred to.)
It’s a reference to this. So while it might be an ingrouping, it’s a somewhat ironic/self-deprecating one, positioning LW members as “freaks” offering Graham a perhaps-not-so-welcome acceptance. ;-)
I’m not sure about that. I suspect these days most people who use that phrase have no idea where it originated.
Are you a forum moderator? Is everyone a forum moderator? Everyone but … Kawoomba?
No, merely someone so dumb as to comment while not yet fully awake and not even re-read comments before submitting them. (Fixed.)