I think you’ve touched on something really important when you mention how it is easier to be a strong critic than to have a real, working solution. This is a common retort against strong criticism—“Oh, but you don’t how to make it any better”—and it seems to be something of a logical fallacy.
There is a certain sense of energy and inspiration behind good criticism which I’ve always been fond of. This is important, because criticism seems to be almost always non-conformist or pessimistic in a certain sense, so I think you kind of need encouragement to remind yourself that criticism is generally originating from good intentions.
I’ve also learned to understand the differences and similarities in the New Age and skeptical cultures, so that I no longer react in a stereotypically offended fashion when I or the people I know and love are referred to as frauds, shams, or dupes. I understand now that these terms are not meant disparagingly, for the most part. I understand now that these terms often mask a great deal of care and concern for people in the New Age culture. It’s sometimes hard to unearth that concern—it often requires an almost anthropological capacity to understand the cultural differences between us—but the concern is there.
I think you’ve touched on something really important when you mention how it is easier to be a strong critic than to have a real, working solution. This is a common retort against strong criticism—“Oh, but you don’t how to make it any better”—and it seems to be something of a logical fallacy.
There is a certain sense of energy and inspiration behind good criticism which I’ve always been fond of. This is important, because criticism seems to be almost always non-conformist or pessimistic in a certain sense, so I think you kind of need encouragement to remind yourself that criticism is generally originating from good intentions.
One of the heartening/depressing parts of “Bridging the Chasm between Two Cultures” by Karla McLaren related to this principle: