When we do this, the independence axiom is a consequence of admissibility
Can you elaborate on this? It seems that the independence axiom becomes true by assuming that all probabilities are independent and each can thus be replaced by a sequence of coin tosses. Am I misunderstanding something?
Can you elaborate on this? It seems that the independence axiom becomes true by assuming that all probabilities are independent and each can thus be replaced by a sequence of coin tosses. Am I misunderstanding something?