I’ve no idea whether any of the evo-psych “explanations” in here are correct, and suspect you haven’t really either, but it was fun to read. And (handwave handwave) even a wrong theory can be useful if its consequences resemble those of the nearest correct theory, so even if pop-evo-psych is badly wrong it may be “right enough” to be useful as a hypothesis generator, a mnemonic aid, and an intuition pump (“images of hooting apes”) -- provided you bear in mind that for all you know it might in fact be quite wrong.
I’ve no idea whether any of the evo-psych “explanations” in here are correct, and suspect you haven’t really either, but it was fun to read. And (handwave handwave) even a wrong theory can be useful if its consequences resemble those of the nearest correct theory, so even if pop-evo-psych is badly wrong it may be “right enough” to be useful as a hypothesis generator, a mnemonic aid, and an intuition pump (“images of hooting apes”) -- provided you bear in mind that for all you know it might in fact be quite wrong.