Instead we have a complex, silent carpet brawl around the meta question on the proper relation of the normative and the prescriptive in politics—e.g. given how much we value moral equality, should we try to justify it with facts/axioms about our environment, or with a deontological, non-disprovable position? - where neither side is even psychologically able to state the issue. That’s how hard sufficient levels of reflection are.
Perhaps this is happening in the system as a whole, but I wouldn’t call this a silent brawl if none of the involved know what the fight is about. And since you posit such a complex explanation…
Perhaps this is happening in the system as a whole, but I wouldn’t call this a silent brawl if none of the involved know what the fight is about. And since you posit such a complex explanation…
Show me the evidence!