I bet the down votes are for re-iterating the parent comments main point as if it were novel and original to you?
Didn’t you understand what this meant: “lets go with “Women deserve to be punished for having sex,” and that ‘life-begins-at-conception’ is just a rationalization”?
Re-reading the grand-grand-grand-grand-parent post, yes, I now see that you’re correct that that was what he was trying to get at—although he certainly wasn’t being particularly clear.
But regardless, downvoting someone for conceding a point to someone they’re engaged in debate with is pretty lame.
Can’t it be both?
Yes, I suppose so. Good point.
Edit: Seriously? Downvotes? For conceding that my political opponent made a good point? Seriously?
I bet the down votes are for re-iterating the parent comments main point as if it were novel and original to you? Didn’t you understand what this meant: “lets go with “Women deserve to be punished for having sex,” and that ‘life-begins-at-conception’ is just a rationalization”?
Re-reading the grand-grand-grand-grand-parent post, yes, I now see that you’re correct that that was what he was trying to get at—although he certainly wasn’t being particularly clear.
But regardless, downvoting someone for conceding a point to someone they’re engaged in debate with is pretty lame.