I think that this thread will go better, by the established norms of LW, if we stick to single, small topics that can actually be taken apart. The question you ask has far too many nested unknowns—definition of party platforms is hard, and economic outcomes of various policies is even harder—and too many places for discussion to go off the rails. Even with this group, that debate will devolve into talking points within three layers of replies. I’d rather have that sort of discussion in an ordinary group, and use LW for political debate of the sort LW actually has an advantage at.
I think that this thread will go better, by the established norms of LW, if we stick to single, small topics that can actually be taken apart. The question you ask has far too many nested unknowns—definition of party platforms is hard, and economic outcomes of various policies is even harder—and too many places for discussion to go off the rails. Even with this group, that debate will devolve into talking points within three layers of replies. I’d rather have that sort of discussion in an ordinary group, and use LW for political debate of the sort LW actually has an advantage at.
Yes many moving parts, but an important part of this discussion could be which are actually more important and which are sideshows.