Re: disagreement with Roko’s “Universal Instrumental Values” / Omohundro’s Basic AI drives?
I don’t see much in the way of problems with Omohundro’s paper.
My only problem with “Universal Instrumental Values” is that it uses the “instrumental/terminal” terminology. AFIACS, “terminal” opposes “intermediate”. I currently favour “proximate/ultimate” as a more conventional description of goals and values.
Re: disagreement with Roko’s “Universal Instrumental Values” / Omohundro’s Basic AI drives?
I don’t see much in the way of problems with Omohundro’s paper.
My only problem with “Universal Instrumental Values” is that it uses the “instrumental/terminal” terminology. AFIACS, “terminal” opposes “intermediate”. I currently favour “proximate/ultimate” as a more conventional description of goals and values.