In this context, the new ruling was not just that there was insufficient evidence but (as I understand it) that she likely had not done it.
This is being widely reported, but my own understanding is that this cannot actually be determined until the motivation document is published.
(Regarding the Kerchers, you will want to see this comment.)
This is being widely reported, but my own understanding is that this cannot actually be determined until the motivation document is published.
(Regarding the Kerchers, you will want to see this comment.)