I don’t mean norm in the sense of “arbitrary standards imposed by society on everybody” , I mean it in the sense of “non arbitrary rules you should follow if you want to obtain specific results”. Rationality is it’s own norm, in that sense.
I think your second sentence is tautological, in that if an agent doesn’t believe what it rationally-ought, then it’s not a rational agent
I think I fully disagree that rationality is a norm. It’s a cluster of things, but the socially-enforced expected patterns are not a big part of it.
And I think your second sentence is tautological, in that if an agent doesn’t believe what it rationally-ought, then it’s not a rational agent.
I do agree that it’s difficult for anti-realists to crisply define “ought” in any way that’s distinct from “prefer”.
I don’t mean norm in the sense of “arbitrary standards imposed by society on everybody” , I mean it in the sense of “non arbitrary rules you should follow if you want to obtain specific results”. Rationality is it’s own norm, in that sense.
Yep. But tautologies are true