I hope you appreciate the irony of bringing up Darwin’s articles on the quality of cryopreservation in the context of someone demanding articles on quality by someone not associated with cryonics institutes.
No, since his articles make the case against current cryonics organisations, despite coming from a strong supporter of the idea.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
I hope you appreciate the irony of bringing up Darwin’s articles on the quality of cryopreservation in the context of someone demanding articles on quality by someone not associated with cryonics institutes.
No, since his articles make the case against current cryonics organisations, despite coming from a strong supporter of the idea.