This is assuming that by cryonicists you mean people who work for cryonics institutes or people who support cryonics without having an academic background in cryobiology.
No.
There are cryobiologists who are cryonicists, e,g. the authors of this paper.
The paper does not mention cryonics, nor does the lead author’s bio mention being a member of the Society for Cryobiology.
So the by-law bans anyone sympathetic to cryonics?
See this article by Mike Darwin.
Thanks!
I’m starting to suspect that my dream of finding an impartial analysis of cryonics is doomed to be forever unfulfilled…
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
No.
There are cryobiologists who are cryonicists, e,g. the authors of this paper.
The paper does not mention cryonics, nor does the lead author’s bio mention being a member of the Society for Cryobiology.
So the by-law bans anyone sympathetic to cryonics?
See this article by Mike Darwin.
Thanks!
I’m starting to suspect that my dream of finding an impartial analysis of cryonics is doomed to be forever unfulfilled…