My claim: “Such plans are more likely to be desirable in deployment”. I’m unclear if you disagree with that, or are just emphasizing the point that “it’s a heuristic, not a proof”.
Real world problems can sometimes be best addressed by complicated, unreliable plans, because there simply aren’t simple reliable plans that make them happen.
I agree. But as a human, if I find a complicated, unreliable plan to solve a problem, I typically look for a new plan, or a new problem. This is discussed a bit in Death with Dignity. I’m concerned about the other side of the heuristic failure.
My claim: “Such plans are more likely to be desirable in deployment”. I’m unclear if you disagree with that, or are just emphasizing the point that “it’s a heuristic, not a proof”.
I agree. But as a human, if I find a complicated, unreliable plan to solve a problem, I typically look for a new plan, or a new problem. This is discussed a bit in Death with Dignity. I’m concerned about the other side of the heuristic failure.