No “most of the arguments are already known” doesn’t cover everything. It’s perfectly possible to not know most of those arguments and still not believe that the Catholic Church had the agenda of hindering science and propagating ignorance.
The assumption that everybody who doesn’t know the arguments believes that is baseless.
I also previously believed the case showed that the Catholic church didn’t care much about science, rather than having a consciously anti-science agenda. I believe it had a strong bias towards staying in charge.
No “most of the arguments are already known” doesn’t cover everything. It’s perfectly possible to not know most of those arguments and still not believe that the Catholic Church had the agenda of hindering science and propagating ignorance.
The assumption that everybody who doesn’t know the arguments believes that is baseless.
If I remember correctly, unfortunately no.
I also previously believed the case showed that the Catholic church didn’t care much about science, rather than having a consciously anti-science agenda. I believe it had a strong bias towards staying in charge.