I can’t help but feel that you are wading into waters which are above your expertise.
Wading?
Eliezer is not beckoning, but drowning.
But your argument is flawed. Discarding an argument because you don’t feel it’s ‘profound’ is an error. There are scores of mundane truths that go ignored because they’re not ‘profound’ enough to interest the self-styled philosophers, and countless empty ‘profundities’ that mean nothing.
Most of the ‘eternal questions’ have already been answered. The trick is to recognize this and move on.
Eliezer is not beckoning, but drowning.
But your argument is flawed. Discarding an argument because you don’t feel it’s ‘profound’ is an error. There are scores of mundane truths that go ignored because they’re not ‘profound’ enough to interest the self-styled philosophers, and countless empty ‘profundities’ that mean nothing.
Most of the ‘eternal questions’ have already been answered. The trick is to recognize this and move on.