Surely any prediction device that would be called “intelligent” by anyone less gung-ho than, say, Ray Kurzweil would enable you to ask it questions like “suppose I—with my current genome—chose to smoke; then what?” and “suppose I—with my current genome—chose not to smoke; then what?”.
But it would be better if you could ask: “suppose I chose to smoke, but my genome and any other similar factors I don’t know about were to stay as they are, then what?” where the other similar factors are things that cause smoking.
But it would be better if you could ask: “suppose I chose to smoke, but my genome and any other similar factors I don’t know about were to stay as they are, then what?” where the other similar factors are things that cause smoking.