For example, that Bayes might give some people better answers than science, and not give other people better answers than science?
Why?
If thats systematic, then the people who don’t get good answers from it are just applying it wrong...and I can repeat my previous comment with “correct Bayes” substituted for “Bayes”.
For example, that Bayes might give some people better answers than science, and not give other people better answers than science?
But I’m not inclined to engage on that further, because I don’t think it’s particularly relevant; see the edit I made to my previous comment.
Why?
If thats systematic, then the people who don’t get good answers from it are just applying it wrong...and I can repeat my previous comment with “correct Bayes” substituted for “Bayes”.
And if it’s random, Bayes isn’t that much good.