I think this is often worth it in personal and blog-post communication, but I wouldn’t say “reinforcement function” in e.g. a conference paper.
I came across this in Ng and Russell (2000) yesterday, and searching for it I see it’s reasonably common. You could probably get away with it.
I came across this in Ng and Russell (2000) yesterday, and searching for it I see it’s reasonably common. You could probably get away with it.