So, does anyone disagree with S? If you agree with S, are you an anti-realist?
I disagree with S and I think you might also. It depends on how you define utility.
Consider two sentiences, P&Q. They are in identical states of mind. However, they are not in identical states of universe. P is in a room which is about to have its exits sealed and will then be slowly filled with an acid solution which will eat the flesh from P’s bones, killing him after about 45 minutes of excruciating pain. Q is in a room in which a screening of the movie “Cabaret” starring Liza Minelli, Robert York, and Joel Grey is about to begin.
But at this moment, neither acid nor movie has started, and P & Q are in the same state of mind. By your definition of utility do they have the same utility?
I disagree with S. I have no idea if agreeing with S makes you an anti-realist, but it does seem to indicate you are underestimating the power of reality to make you unhappy.
I guess the realism aspect isn’t as relevant as I thought it would be. I expected that any realists would believe S, and that anti-realists might or might not. I also think that not believing S would imply anti-realism, but I’m not super confident that that’s true.
I would say that P and Q have equal utility until the point where their circumstances diverge, after which of course they would have different utilities. There is no reason to consider future utility when talking about current utility. So it just depends on what section of time you are looking at. If you’re only looking at a segment where P and Q have identical brain states, then yes I would say they have the same utility.
I disagree with S and I think you might also. It depends on how you define utility.
Consider two sentiences, P&Q. They are in identical states of mind. However, they are not in identical states of universe. P is in a room which is about to have its exits sealed and will then be slowly filled with an acid solution which will eat the flesh from P’s bones, killing him after about 45 minutes of excruciating pain. Q is in a room in which a screening of the movie “Cabaret” starring Liza Minelli, Robert York, and Joel Grey is about to begin.
But at this moment, neither acid nor movie has started, and P & Q are in the same state of mind. By your definition of utility do they have the same utility?
I disagree with S. I have no idea if agreeing with S makes you an anti-realist, but it does seem to indicate you are underestimating the power of reality to make you unhappy.
I guess the realism aspect isn’t as relevant as I thought it would be. I expected that any realists would believe S, and that anti-realists might or might not. I also think that not believing S would imply anti-realism, but I’m not super confident that that’s true.
I would say that P and Q have equal utility until the point where their circumstances diverge, after which of course they would have different utilities. There is no reason to consider future utility when talking about current utility. So it just depends on what section of time you are looking at. If you’re only looking at a segment where P and Q have identical brain states, then yes I would say they have the same utility.