Some RPGs with magic (Ars Magica comes to mind), illusions are cheap but changing actual physical matter is hard. This provides a ready answer to many questions about chicanery.
Call of Cthulhu GM’s have the advantage that the player character is dealing with entities that will probably eat them if they try to be too clever.
I am not convinced this is true.
The game certainly has entities that will eat you regardless of whether you’re too clever, but that’s not the same thing.
In other words, there is an in-universe for an out of universe constraint
Out of universe: we don’t want player characters to be too powerful.
In universe: Well, we all know what happens to those guys in Lovecraft stories, right?
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Some RPGs with magic (Ars Magica comes to mind), illusions are cheap but changing actual physical matter is hard. This provides a ready answer to many questions about chicanery.
Call of Cthulhu GM’s have the advantage that the player character is dealing with entities that will probably eat them if they try to be too clever.
I am not convinced this is true.
The game certainly has entities that will eat you regardless of whether you’re too clever, but that’s not the same thing.
In other words, there is an in-universe for an out of universe constraint
Out of universe: we don’t want player characters to be too powerful.
In universe: Well, we all know what happens to those guys in Lovecraft stories, right?