Fair enough. “Because” itself isn’t perfectly transparent word: X because Y may mean that
(etymologically) Y is a cause of X: “I have been arrested because I have robbed a bank.”
Y is a purpose for X: “I robbed the bank because I wanted the money.”
X is logically deducible from Y: The apple fell down because of the laws of gravity.
(and I believed that also) X is probabilistically deducible from Y. I have used the word “because” in this sense, as a shorthand for “and the evidence for the previous claim is that”, which after all may be ungrammatical.
Fair enough. “Because” itself isn’t perfectly transparent word: X because Y may mean that
(etymologically) Y is a cause of X: “I have been arrested because I have robbed a bank.”
Y is a purpose for X: “I robbed the bank because I wanted the money.”
X is logically deducible from Y: The apple fell down because of the laws of gravity.
(and I believed that also) X is probabilistically deducible from Y. I have used the word “because” in this sense, as a shorthand for “and the evidence for the previous claim is that”, which after all may be ungrammatical.
In any case, should is redundand.