Too bad that my list of AI safety resources didn’t make it into the survey—would be good to know to what extent it would be useful to keep maintaining it. Will you be running future iterations of this survey?
Would have been good to ask about that and also mine it for resources.
Re: future iterations, I’m not sure. On one hand, I think it’s kind of bad for this kind of thing to be run by a person who stands to benefit from his thing ranking high on the survey. On the other hand, I’m not sure if anyone else wants to do it, and I think it would be good to run future iterations.
If anyone does want to take it over, please let me know. I’m not sure how many would be interested in doing that (maybe grantmaking orgs?), but if there are multiple such people it would probably be good to pick a designated successor. I should say that I reserve the right to wait until next year to make any sort of decision on this.
Too bad that my list of AI safety resources didn’t make it into the survey—would be good to know to what extent it would be useful to keep maintaining it. Will you be running future iterations of this survey?
Would have been good to ask about that and also mine it for resources.
Re: future iterations, I’m not sure. On one hand, I think it’s kind of bad for this kind of thing to be run by a person who stands to benefit from his thing ranking high on the survey. On the other hand, I’m not sure if anyone else wants to do it, and I think it would be good to run future iterations.
If anyone does want to take it over, please let me know. I’m not sure how many would be interested in doing that (maybe grantmaking orgs?), but if there are multiple such people it would probably be good to pick a designated successor. I should say that I reserve the right to wait until next year to make any sort of decision on this.
Similarly, the next iteration of this should definitely ask about The Inside View.