When someone says that “🟩” is “greenness”, we do not accuse that person of denying the existence of “🟩”. Why then, when someone says that “🟩” is “activity in the visual cortex”, do we make such an accusation?
That isn’t a statement of illusionism, it’s statement of reductionism or identity theory.
That isn’t a statement of illusionism, it’s statement of reductionism or identity theory.
What would the statement of illusionism be then? That 🟩 is an illusion? Surely, yes, but digging deeper, you would get to some form of brain activity.
Illusionists thinks the illusion is brain activity, yes.