The way I’d think about this sort of question is: what am I trying to accomplish? If it’s the sort of accusation where establishing common knowledge seems like it ought to significantly reduce the risk of future recurrence (or even mitigate harm in the event that the behavior is repeated), that makes the case for publishing stronger. The quality of the evidence matters too.
Also, just checking that you’ve considered the obvious options:
reporting this to formal authorities (with whatever attendant trade-offs you consider that option to have)
reporting this to the CEA community health team, assuming they’re enough a part of the EA community for that to be a relevant option
The way I’d think about this sort of question is: what am I trying to accomplish? If it’s the sort of accusation where establishing common knowledge seems like it ought to significantly reduce the risk of future recurrence (or even mitigate harm in the event that the behavior is repeated), that makes the case for publishing stronger. The quality of the evidence matters too.
Also, just checking that you’ve considered the obvious options:
reporting this to formal authorities (with whatever attendant trade-offs you consider that option to have)
reporting this to the CEA community health team, assuming they’re enough a part of the EA community for that to be a relevant option
Nod, good thing to check on both points. I hadn’t thought of the second until you suggested it. I think I should not personally do either.