If you don’t accept the additivity of harm, you accept that for any harm x, there is some number of people y where 2^y people suffering x harm is the same welfare wise as y people suffering x harm.
No. I can imagine non-additive harm evaluation systems where that is not the case.
Even in the limited subset of systems where that IS the case, so what?
No. I can imagine non-additive harm evaluation systems where that is not the case.
Even in the limited subset of systems where that IS the case, so what?