Morgan is the only monk at his temple making use of this particular opportunity.
The effect of channelling two tainted mana types is the same as channelling a tainted mana type alongside a weaker untainted one. For this reason, Morgan will refuse if you advise him to channel (for example) Spite alongside Doom.
The ritual takes the entire ten days to prepare, and the details vary greatly based on which mana types he channels; he’s also the only monk at his temple who can do his kind of meditation, and won’t have time to meditate while laying the groundwork; as such, Morgan can’t make use of any information past day 374 when predicting day 384.
1. How big a deal is “an immortal demon, wreaking horror and bloodshed upon the world”?*
2. Can the ritual in someway counteract that? Any specific bonuses, or things that are stronger against demons, or more helpful in a world where one is running loose?
3. How would multiple rituals (separately interact)?
4. An ideas at all around probability of other people doing a ritual like this one? Across the entire world?*
This particular factor suggests...that there is a calculation that could be performed, taking into account the possibility of someone else turning into a demon, in order to guess if it would be beneficial to intentional channel one of Void, Doom, or Spite, so that any advantage a intentionally evil ritual would have, you would also have (if they happened at the same time).
That’s unlikely to be the result of such a calculation (especially because, say, if they all happened at the same time, then...if things go south, that is more demons...depending on the procedures involved).
*As the saying goes, expected value is probability times magnitude.
1. How big a deal is “an immortal demon, wreaking horror and bloodshed upon the world”?
Morgan seems to think that ensuring this doesn’t happen should be your top priority, but he’s biased for obvious reasons. If you feel increasing the probability and/or magnitude of success is worth risking the worst outcome, that’s a valid decision.
2. Can the ritual in someway counteract that? Any specific bonuses, or things that are stronger against demons, or more helpful in a world where one is running loose?
Nope.
3. How would multiple rituals (separately interact)?
They wouldn’t.
4. An ideas at all around probability of other people doing a ritual like this one? Across the entire world?
Clarifications:
Morgan is the only monk at his temple making use of this particular opportunity.
The effect of channelling two tainted mana types is the same as channelling a tainted mana type alongside a weaker untainted one. For this reason, Morgan will refuse if you advise him to channel (for example) Spite alongside Doom.
The ritual takes the entire ten days to prepare, and the details vary greatly based on which mana types he channels; he’s also the only monk at his temple who can do his kind of meditation, and won’t have time to meditate while laying the groundwork; as such, Morgan can’t make use of any information past day 374 when predicting day 384.
1. How big a deal is “an immortal demon, wreaking horror and bloodshed upon the world”?*
2. Can the ritual in someway counteract that? Any specific bonuses, or things that are stronger against demons, or more helpful in a world where one is running loose?
3. How would multiple rituals (separately interact)?
4. An ideas at all around probability of other people doing a ritual like this one? Across the entire world?*
This particular factor suggests...that there is a calculation that could be performed, taking into account the possibility of someone else turning into a demon, in order to guess if it would be beneficial to intentional channel one of Void, Doom, or Spite, so that any advantage a intentionally evil ritual would have, you would also have (if they happened at the same time).
That’s unlikely to be the result of such a calculation (especially because, say, if they all happened at the same time, then...if things go south, that is more demons...depending on the procedures involved).
*As the saying goes, expected value is probability times magnitude.
Morgan seems to think that ensuring this doesn’t happen should be your top priority, but he’s biased for obvious reasons. If you feel increasing the probability and/or magnitude of success is worth risking the worst outcome, that’s a valid decision.
Nope.
They wouldn’t.
Possible but unlikely.