I went into the article thinking the guy would have a freakishly high IQ (160+) where I could maybe see the point, but instead was 125. The judges most likely scored higher than that—aren’t they feeling even slightly belittled at the suggestion that they’d be ineligible for law enforcement work because they’d find it too boring?
I went into the article thinking the guy would have a freakishly high IQ (160+) where I could maybe see the point, but instead was 125. The judges most likely scored higher than that—aren’t they feeling even slightly belittled at the suggestion that they’d be ineligible for law enforcement work because they’d find it too boring?