I think you are confusing “theory” and “interpretation.” There is consensus on the vast majority (all?) of QM, the physical theory.
“Interpretations” are stories we tell ourselves. Arguing about interpretation is like arguing about taste.
Fine, but something needs explanation when you’ve got this energy-conserving theory which results in the energy content of the universe changing.
The quantum theory has the same predictions for all interpretations, and does not violate energy conservation.
I don’t know what “energy content of the universe changing” means if energy is conserved. You are arguing about taste.
I think you are confusing “theory” and “interpretation.” There is consensus on the vast majority (all?) of QM, the physical theory.
“Interpretations” are stories we tell ourselves. Arguing about interpretation is like arguing about taste.
Fine, but something needs explanation when you’ve got this energy-conserving theory which results in the energy content of the universe changing.
The quantum theory has the same predictions for all interpretations, and does not violate energy conservation.
I don’t know what “energy content of the universe changing” means if energy is conserved. You are arguing about taste.