More generally it’s inconsistent to believe in non-negligible chance of living in a simulation and negligible chance of various religious claims being true, but plenty of people here do so.
To me this mostly shows that people don’t do anything like Bayesian propagation of evidence, but I don’t think Bayesianism is a good model of thinking processes.
More generally it’s inconsistent to believe in non-negligible chance of living in a simulation and negligible chance of various religious claims being true, but plenty of people here do so.
To me this mostly shows that people don’t do anything like Bayesian propagation of evidence, but I don’t think Bayesianism is a good model of thinking processes.