The iterated lossy cross-scale Keynesian beauty contest is a big attractor.
What is the iterated lossy cross-scale Keynesian beauty contest?
I can’t tell whether anything you said is supposed to imply that there is a flaw in my reasoning. “Supporting whatever agentic information cascades have already most effectively burrowed themselves into the most salient cultural-political sphere” is not obviously wrong. When I provide a step-by-step argument that assigns a probability to each step and then multiplies them together, it has a limited number of places to attack; and you didn’t mention any of them.
I don’t understand much of what you wrote; but my impression is that you are trying to pull the discussion back into vague, subjective regions that provide endless opportunities for rhetorical displays, and no danger of making progress.
What is the iterated lossy cross-scale Keynesian beauty contest?
I can’t tell whether anything you said is supposed to imply that there is a flaw in my reasoning. “Supporting whatever agentic information cascades have already most effectively burrowed themselves into the most salient cultural-political sphere” is not obviously wrong. When I provide a step-by-step argument that assigns a probability to each step and then multiplies them together, it has a limited number of places to attack; and you didn’t mention any of them.
I don’t understand much of what you wrote; but my impression is that you are trying to pull the discussion back into vague, subjective regions that provide endless opportunities for rhetorical displays, and no danger of making progress.